- Articles (5)
- Aviation Accident (2)
- Birth injury (6)
- Bus Accidents (5)
- Car Accidents (208)
- Drunk Driving Accidents (4)
- Firm News (39)
- Medical Malpractice (103)
- Medication Errors (1)
- Personal Injury (101)
- Premises Liability (2)
- Product Liability (22)
- Railroad Accidents (1)
- Tort Reform (5)
- Truck Accidents (58)
- Workplace Accidents (12)
- Wrongful Death (46)
Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge attorney Daniel L. Clayton was recently recertified as a civil trial advocate by the ...
An article recently published by the Tennessean reports that a single building inspector’s mistake allowed at least 85 ...
19 pedestrians have been killed in car accidents in Nashville, TN this year, a new city record, with another month and a ...
Randall L. Kinnard, Daniel L. Clayton, Mark S. Beveridge Named to the 2017 List of Super Lawyers, Rising Stars
We are excited to announce that Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge partners Randall L. Kinnard, Daniel L. Clayton, and Mark S. ...
The Impact of Gov Haslam's Tort Reform Bill on Medical Malpractice Cases
Posted By Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge || Jul 20, 2011
I am speaking today on the Impact of Gov. Haslam's Tort Reform Bill on Medical Malpractice Cases. I am doing this seminar, along with Steve Anderson, for the Nashville Bar Association. We will be discussing the 750,000 caps on damages and the $1,000,000 cap on catastrophic damages. For more information, visit The Impact of Gov Haslam's Tort Reform Bill on Medical Malpractice Cases.
There are several parts of this bill that are disturbing.
First, the bill was passed under the political mantra of "job creation." However, not one expert testified before the committee that a job would be created by passing this law. Next, the sentaors discussed how the caps would give the jury good guidance and we could have more predictability in our jury verdicts. Yet, the caps are kept a secret from the jury. Finally, if a person suffers a spinal cord injury and can no longer walk, then the legislature has acknowledged that person may be catastrohpically injured. However, if a child suffers a severe brain injury from a loss of oxygen, and can no longer walk, talk and is fed through a tube, that injury is not elgible for the catastrophic exception. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?