- Articles (5)
- Aviation Accident (2)
- Birth injury (6)
- Bus Accidents (5)
- Car Accidents (208)
- Drunk Driving Accidents (4)
- Firm News (39)
- Medical Malpractice (103)
- Medication Errors (1)
- Personal Injury (101)
- Premises Liability (2)
- Product Liability (22)
- Railroad Accidents (1)
- Tort Reform (5)
- Truck Accidents (58)
- Workplace Accidents (12)
- Wrongful Death (46)
Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge attorney Daniel L. Clayton was recently recertified as a civil trial advocate by the ...
19 pedestrians have been killed in car accidents in Nashville, TN this year, a new city record, with another month and a ...
Randall L. Kinnard, Daniel L. Clayton, Mark S. Beveridge Named to the 2017 List of Super Lawyers, Rising Stars
We are excited to announce that Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge partners Randall L. Kinnard, Daniel L. Clayton, and Mark S. ...
Attorney Daniel L. Clayton Named 2018 "Lawyer of the Year", Selected to the 2018 List of The Best Lawyers in America© With Attorneys Randall L. Kinnard, Mark S. Beveridge and Mary Ellen Morris
We are proud to announce that Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge partner Daniel L. Clayton was named the 2018 Nashville ...
Will privacy concerns increase the risk of medical errors?
Posted By Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge || Feb 14, 2013
Medical information is highly personal and certainly no one else's business. This is why there are specific guidelines in place to try and protect a patient's medical history. However, with an increased push for even stricter privacy protections, some are starting to wonder if the threat of fines for breaching security could end up negatively impacting patients.
One doctor recently shared his opinion on the new privacy rules and the potential for fines between $100 and $1,000,000. His concern is that doctors will be too worried about privacy protocols, and therefore, not giving complete focus to their patients.
In this case, the doctor became concerned after reading an article in the American Medical News and attempting to decipher what the new rules could mean. From what he could tell, practices will be responsible for handling a risk assessment program. This program is meant to protect health data. This system must be continuously checked in order to make sure there are no breaches in security when it comes to medical information. This will include making sure others who handle the data, like shredding companies, are also careful with the health data.
Failing to comply with these stricter privacy rules could come with rather hefty fines.
The concern though is that doctors, especially those working at smaller practices, will be so worried about this new risk assessment program that their minds will not be solely focused on the patients they are seeing. If this is true, there is always the chance medical mistakes will be made, which could have very serious consequences for patients.
But what do you think? How important is protecting health data? Should this be up to the doctors, or should other staff be in charge? Should the level of medical care and privacy be the same?