- Articles (5)
- Aviation Accident (2)
- Birth injury (6)
- Bus Accidents (5)
- Car Accidents (208)
- Drunk Driving Accidents (4)
- Firm News (40)
- Medical Malpractice (104)
- Medication Errors (1)
- Personal Injury (101)
- Premises Liability (2)
- Product Liability (22)
- Railroad Accidents (1)
- Tort Reform (5)
- Truck Accidents (58)
- Workplace Accidents (12)
- Wrongful Death (46)
Smart Growth America, an organization that focuses on research, advocacy and bringing smart growth practices to ...
Attorney Daniel L. Clayton Named 2018 "Lawyer of the Year", Selected to the 2018 List of The Best Lawyers in America© With Attorneys Randall L. Kinnard, Mark S. Beveridge and Mary Ellen Morris
We are proud to announce that Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge partner Daniel L. Clayton was named the 2018 Nashville ...
We are excited to announce that attorney Jenney Keaty was selected to take part in the Tennessee Bar Association’s (TBA) ...
An article recently published by the Tennessean reports that a single building inspector’s mistake allowed at least 85 ...
Crash prevention: safety group offers input on automatic braking
Posted By Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge || Jun 9, 2014
A science-fiction world in which spaceship-type cars fly effortlessly to their destinations still lives only in the imagination.
To be sure, car design has improved somewhat since the more primitive earlier iterations of the industry. But safety recalls remain common and the automobile industry still has plenty of work to do in order to create safer cars.
One area of such work involves the development of automatic braking systems. In this post, we will take note of how automakers are responding to a new crash-prevention program emphasizing such systems.
The program is sponsored by a respected safety group, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IHS).
Less than a year ago, the IHS put in place a safety-rating program aimed at preventing crashes.
The program involves assessment of the safety capacities for preventing crashes, particularly by using automatic brakes.
The vehicles tested for safety by the IHS were primarily larger cars. Many of the models were SUVS or luxury cars.
The feedback on the new models that IHS has given to automakers has already led to further improvements, according to the IHS’s chief researcher.
The rating system assigns front-end crash prevention features to one of three categories. Front crash prevention essentially means automatic braking, with varying levels of speed reduction.
The more advanced crash-prevention systems may also provide a warning of some type to the driver of a possibly impending crash.
There is no technological fix that can take a way car accident risks entirely. As we have discussed, however, efforts are underway to create automatic braking systems that offer incremental progress in helping drivers avoid crashes.